|
Post by Kei-Lin on Nov 20, 2007 23:22:57 GMT -5
That's what you think...
|
|
|
Post by ExoticHunter on Dec 8, 2007 3:52:48 GMT -5
I think the robots being developed in Japan are interesting. They look human and can talk.
|
|
|
Post by Kei-Lin on Dec 8, 2007 10:15:48 GMT -5
I am building a real Terminator
|
|
|
Post by Sweet Eet on Dec 8, 2007 14:31:56 GMT -5
The hydraulic kind? or the kind that flows?
|
|
|
Post by Kei-Lin on Dec 8, 2007 16:31:44 GMT -5
The hydraulic kind.
The kind that flows is called a "T-1000" and it uses nano-bots. That type of nanotechnology, the kind that can retract all that liquid metal and hold it in place, is too advanced at the current time.
|
|
|
Post by ExoticHunter on Dec 16, 2007 1:14:36 GMT -5
People who make movies and write books do research to make it seem like reality. Are you sure this technology does not exist?
|
|
|
Post by Kei-Lin on Dec 16, 2007 18:56:38 GMT -5
Nanotechnology does exist, but the magnetizers and the programming do not.
|
|
|
Post by Sweet Eet on Dec 17, 2007 23:49:22 GMT -5
Then where did they get the idea for the film?
|
|
|
Post by Kei-Lin on Dec 18, 2007 0:01:52 GMT -5
From the idea of how mercury flows. Even nanotechnology didn't exist at the time T2 came out... it's recent
|
|
|
Post by ExoticHunter on Dec 22, 2007 0:27:00 GMT -5
Watching Mercury gives the idea of how something flows. Where did the idea of taking the shape and identity of something else come from?
|
|
|
Post by Kei-Lin on Dec 22, 2007 12:10:35 GMT -5
Maybe from the book "I, Robot" or something?
|
|
|
Post by ExoticHunter on Dec 31, 2007 7:09:36 GMT -5
It's interesting that books about robots and this kind of technology have existed for many years.
Code allowing chat has existed for getting close to 50 years now.
|
|
|
Post by Sweet Eet on Dec 31, 2007 15:21:11 GMT -5
Indeed, I agree with you. They are farther along with this stuff than thay want to admit...
|
|