|
Post by Kei-Lin on Apr 30, 2008 20:39:11 GMT -5
I have recently decided that nanotechnology is among the most fascinating parts of advanced robotics and the theory of biomechanical engineering. The idea of millions of tiny robots, so small that they can only be viewed under a microscope, working together with collective computer systems to do incredible things and enter places which no human could enter is simply amazing.
Derived from ideas based on modern nanotechnology, I have created a new set of plans in which tachyons substitute atoms. The use of sub-atomic particles not only makes the nano-buts resistant to acid, but tachyons are known to have some time-traveling ability as well. So I think that using tachyon-composed nano-bots could give us the feel we need for time-travel. Is it possible that humans could one day go back in time, or will they dissipate due to a new law of physics: An exact duplicate of matter cannot exist in the same time as another duplicate of the same matter? Will we one day find that this is true, or will we find that it can't be true because clones and the originals don't disspiate in that way? (Although that is a completely separate matter, seeing that clones aren't composed of the same atoms) Will tachyons become the future of nanotechnology? Post your thoughts on this idea here!
|
|
|
Post by Robocop on May 1, 2008 5:35:06 GMT -5
I don't understand it. You're trying to bind little thingies so they have a physical structure?
|
|
|
Post by Kei-Lin on May 6, 2008 10:57:56 GMT -5
Kind of...
|
|
|
Post by Sweet Eet on May 7, 2008 19:17:35 GMT -5
Would i be possible, for example, to send them around in a person's blood stream to dissolve blood clots?
|
|
|
Post by Kei-Lin on May 7, 2008 21:06:59 GMT -5
Sure, putting the nanobots in a human body is easy. The problems would be how they identify the clot and tell it apart from the rest of the body, and how to get them out after their purpose has been served.
|
|
|
Post by Sweet Eet on May 10, 2008 9:43:42 GMT -5
Removing them, I have no idea... identifying the clot is a simple matter. Clots form using von Willebrand factor (a protein which induces blood clots). Locate this protein and one will locate the clot.
|
|
|
Post by Kei-Lin on May 10, 2008 11:10:04 GMT -5
So I'm programming the nano-bots to identify a protein molecule? Well... That might not be too hard, if I could identify it myself to program the description.
|
|
|
Post by Sweet Eet on May 21, 2008 1:17:37 GMT -5
The molecule has already been identified (which is why I can name it)
|
|
|
Post by Kei-Lin on Jun 2, 2008 8:17:26 GMT -5
That's not what I meant. I meant that the nano-bots would have to be able to tell it apart from other molecules.
|
|
|
Post by ExoticHunter on Jun 17, 2008 12:06:18 GMT -5
Molecules are ALL different; some are radically different. Shouldn't be a problem.
|
|
|
Post by Kei-Lin on Jun 22, 2008 12:11:58 GMT -5
Yes, but someone has to program that... Which means that the programmer would also have to be able to tell the difference.
|
|
|
Post by Sweet Eet on Jun 22, 2008 23:14:43 GMT -5
The general stupidity of humanity is always a problem. Guess you need a Chemist/Programmer!
|
|
|
Post by ExoticHunter on Jun 29, 2008 11:24:13 GMT -5
What about a Chemical Engineer?
|
|
|
Post by Kei-Lin on Jul 2, 2008 18:04:47 GMT -5
If the chemical engineer and the programmer don't misunderstanf each other, that would work.
|
|
|
Post by ExoticHunter on Jul 31, 2008 23:08:36 GMT -5
Okay, then what? (remember - the stupidity of programmers is legendary)
|
|